Which indicator would most strongly suggest bias in an informational text?

• A. The author uses neutral language that acknowledges counterarguments
• B. The author presents data from diverse sources
• C. The author cites only a small number of sources
• D. The author uses emotionally charged language that favors one side

Answer: (D)

Bias in informational texts shows up most clearly when the author uses emotionally charged language that clearly favors one side. That kind of language nudges readers to feel a certain way about the issue rather than evaluating the evidence on its merits. It signals the author isn’t presenting information neutrally, but is trying to persuade by appealing to emotions.

Why this is the strongest indicator: when words carry strong emotional weight, they prompt a reaction instead of encouraging careful analysis of facts. A statement like “This policy will ruin our future” sways opinion through feeling, not through balanced evidence. In contrast, acknowledging counterarguments shows a willingness to present multiple viewpoints, presenting data from diverse sources suggests breadth and checks for reliability, and citing a limited number of sources can raise questions about completeness, but none of these necessarily demonstrates bias as directly as loaded, opinionated language does.

So, emotionally charged language that favors one side best signals bias in an informational text.